Earstine vs Earlene
Side-by-side comparison of Earstine and Earlene - popularity rank, total births, peak decade, and historical trends from Social Security Administration data.
Which name is more popular?
| Metric | Earstine | Earlene |
|---|---|---|
| Current Rank | Unranked | Unranked |
| Total Births (all years) | 11 | 14,165 |
| Peak Year | 1933 | 1947 |
| Peak Year Births | 6 | 407 |
| Peak Decade | 1930s | 1940s |
| Gender | Girl | Girl |
| First Recorded Year | 1933 | 1901 |
Births by Decade
| Decade | Earstine | Earlene |
|---|---|---|
| 1900s | - | 51 |
| 1910s | - | 613 |
| 1920s | - | 2,144 |
| 1930s | 6 | 3,264 |
| 1940s | - | 3,689 |
| 1950s | 5 | 2,615 |
| 1960s | - | 1,143 |
| 1970s | - | 362 |
| 1980s | - | 196 |
| 1990s | - | 83 |
| 2000s | - | 5 |
Data Sources
Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, ssa.gov/oact/babynames.
Source: SSA Annual Name Rankings, 1933–1956.