Abhijot — boys' name
58 babies named Abhijot in U.S. Social Security records since 2009, with the highest year being 2009. Year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state-level rankings drawn from federal birth data.
86% of everyone ever named Abhijot was born in this single decade.
8 babies were named Abhijot in 2009 — its busiest year on record.
What the Data Says About Abhijot
The Social Security Administration has registered 58 babies named Abhijot between 2009 and 2019, spanning 11 consecutive years of U.S. birth records. As a boy's name, Abhijot currently falls outside the top 1,000 boys' names for 2019. The name reached its historical peak in 2009, when 8 babies received it in a single year.
Decade-level aggregation shows that Abhijot performed strongest in the 2010s, accumulating 50 births during that ten-year window. Across the 2 decades of recorded activity, Abhijot shows a stable profile with only moderate drift from its peak decade. Geographically, the name is most concentrated in California, which accounts for 5 births — the largest state-level total in the dataset — followed by . In total, SSA state-level files list Abhijot in 1 of the 51 U.S. reporting jurisdictions.
No etymological entry is currently available for Abhijot in our reference dataset. These figures derive from SSA's annual national and state-level name files, which include any name appearing at least five times in a given year or state-year; names below that threshold are suppressed for privacy and therefore excluded from the totals shown here. The 58 total represents a lower bound — actual usage may be higher in years or states where the count fell below the disclosure floor. This page is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute personal, legal, or naming advice.
Abhijot at a glance
Last recorded 2019Peak year
Current rank
Active since
Abhijot popularity over time
Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 2019–2009
- Peak year (2009)
- 8
- Annual births at peak — across 11 years of records
No longer in the modern top-1000 — last recorded 2019.
58 total births across 11 years of SSA records. Peaked in 2009 with 8 births in a single year.
Abhijot by decade
Total births in each ten-year window — peak vs trough at a glance
- Peak decade
- 2010s
- 50 births that decade — 86% of Abhijot's all-time total
Abhijot decade highlights
- Peak decade 50 births
- Runner-up 8 births
- Decades tracked with recorded births
2010s was Abhijot's strongest decade
50 babies received the name during that ten-year window — about 86% of all-time use.
Abhijot by state
Where Abhijot concentrates geographically — total births since 2009
| Rank | State | Visual share | Births | Share of total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | | 5 | 8.6% |
5 of 58 births nationwide.
Top 5 states
- California 8.6% of nationwide
Recorded in 1 of 51 SSA jurisdictions
California accounts for 8.6% of all recorded births nationwide — a relatively diffuse profile for this name.
Frequently Asked Questions
How popular is the name Abhijot? ▼
When was Abhijot most popular? ▼
Where is Abhijot most popular? ▼
How long has the name Abhijot been used? ▼
What names are similar to Abhijot? ▼
Keep exploring Abhijot
Nearby Names Like Abhijot
Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Abhijot
Compare Abhijot side by side: Abhijot vs Abhinav Abhijot vs Abhiram Abhijot vs Abhay
Related Names
Names with a similar number of total births
Baby Name Guides
Learn more about naming trends and how to use data to choose a name
Explore more names
Data Sources
Data as of 2024. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).
Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications — National Data, 2009–2019 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames). National-level data includes all names with 5 or more occurrences in a given year.
State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names — State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip). Includes all names with 5 or more occurrences per state per year; rarer names are excluded for privacy.