Girls' name · since 2009
Akriti
27 babies named Akriti in U.S. Social Security records since 2009, with the highest year being 2011. Year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state-level rankings drawn from federal birth data.
- 27
- total births
- 2009–2016
- years on record
- 2010s
- peak decade
- 81%
- born in that decade
Akriti sits outside today's top ranks for girls, with 27 recorded since 2009.
Social Security Administration records show Akriti recorded 27 times among girls since 2009, though it doesn't currently rank among the most-used girls names, peaking in the 2010s. This profile derives year-by-year birth trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 2009 to 2016.
- 27 total births
- 2009–2016 years on record
- 2010s peak decade
- 81% born in that decade
Data updated Jul 2026
The verdict
27 girls have been named Akriti since 2009, peaking in the 2010s, last recorded in 2016.
- 27
- total births
- 2009–2016
- years on record
- 2010s
- peak decade
- 81%
- born in that decade
81% of everyone ever named Akriti was born in this single decade.
9 babies were named Akriti in 2011 - its busiest year on record.
Akriti's usage pattern, beyond the headline number
Divide Akriti's SSA record in two at 2015 and the more recent half accounts for 48% of all births, the earlier half the remaining 52%, a genuinely balanced usage pattern. Its calmest year was 2009, with only 5 births recorded -- set against the 2011 peak of 9, that's the full swing in one name's fortunes.
Akriti at a glance
Last recorded 2016Peak year
Current rank
Active since
Akriti popularity over time
Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 2009–2016
- Peak year (2011)
- 9
- Annual births at peak, across 8 years of records
No longer in the modern top-1000, last recorded 2016.
27 total births across 8 years of SSA records. Peaked in 2011 with 9 births in a single year.
Akriti by decade
Total births in each ten-year window, peak vs trough at a glance
2010s was Akriti's strongest decade.
22 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 81% of all-time use.
Akriti births by decade
Total births in each ten-year window
- 2000s 5
2000s
5 births
- 2010s
2010s
22 births
What this shows Peak: 2010s at 22 births (81% of all-time use).
Akriti decade highlights
- Peak decade 22 births
- Runner-up 5 births
- Decades tracked with recorded births
Frequently Asked Questions
How popular is the name Akriti? ▼
When was Akriti most popular? ▼
How long has the name Akriti been used? ▼
What names are similar to Akriti? ▼
Keep exploring Akriti
Nearby Names Like Akriti
Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Akriti
Compare Akriti side by side: Akriti vs Akria
Related Names
Names with a similar number of total births
Data Sources
Data as of July 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).
According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.
Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 2009–2016 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).
State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).
Cite this page
NameAlmanac Editorial. "Akriti: Baby Name Since 2009 - 27 Births, Peak 2011." NameAlmanac. Accessed via https://namealmanac.com/name/akriti. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.
Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Akriti draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.
Published by
NameAlmanac Editorial
Independent public-data reference that compiles, verifies, and contextualizes official datasets. We do not accept compensation from entities we cover, and every dataset cites its originating public source.