Recorded 1917–1967 Boys' name Peak 1957 128 births

Dub — boys' name

128 babies named Dub in U.S. Social Security records since 1917, with the highest year being 1957. Year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state-level rankings drawn from federal birth data.

1910s51920s121930s181940s161950s471960s30
1950s
Peak decade

37% of everyone ever named Dub was born in this single decade.

1957
Single peak year

11 babies were named Dub in 1957 — its busiest year on record.

What the Data Says About Dub

The Social Security Administration has registered 128 babies named Dub between 1917 and 1967, spanning 51 consecutive years of U.S. birth records. As a boy's name, Dub currently falls outside the top 1,000 boys' names for 1967. The name reached its historical peak in 1957, when 11 babies received it in a single year.

Decade-level aggregation shows that Dub performed strongest in the 1950s, accumulating 47 births during that ten-year window. Across the 6 decades of recorded activity, Dub shows notable generational variation in parental adoption. Geographically, the name is most concentrated in Texas, which accounts for 5 births — the largest state-level total in the dataset — followed by . In total, SSA state-level files list Dub in 1 of the 51 U.S. reporting jurisdictions.

No etymological entry is currently available for Dub in our reference dataset. These figures derive from SSA's annual national and state-level name files, which include any name appearing at least five times in a given year or state-year; names below that threshold are suppressed for privacy and therefore excluded from the totals shown here. The 128 total represents a lower bound — actual usage may be higher in years or states where the count fell below the disclosure floor. This page is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute personal, legal, or naming advice.

Dub at a glance

Last recorded 1967

Total births

128

Since 1917

51 years of records

Peak year

1957

11 births that year

Strongest decade: 1950s

Current rank

Unranked

Outside the modern top-1,000

As of 1967

Active since

1917

Recorded for 51 years

Last year on file: 1967

Dub popularity over time

Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 1967–1917

Last recorded 1967
Peak year (1957)
11
Annual births at peak — across 51 years of records
4681012 19671961195719541948193519261917 5

Dub by decade

Total births in each ten-year window — peak vs trough at a glance

Peak: 1950s
Peak decade
1950s
47 births that decade — 37% of Dub's all-time total
1910s51920s121930s181940s161950s471960s30

Dub by state

Where Dub concentrates geographically — total births since 1917

Geographically diffuse
Top 1 states by recorded births for the name Dub
Rank State Visual share Births Share of total
#1 Texas
5 3.9%
Texas share of Dub's total US births 3.9%

5 of 128 births nationwide.

Frequently Asked Questions

How popular is the name Dub?
128 babies have been named Dub since 1917. It was last recorded in 1967. The peak year was 1957 with 11 births.
When was Dub most popular?
Dub was most popular in the 1950s decade with 47 total births. The single peak year was 1957.
Where is Dub most popular?
The top states for the name Dub are Texas (5 births).
How long has the name Dub been used?
Dub has been recorded in Social Security data since 1917, spanning 51 years of data through 1967.
What names are similar to Dub?
Names with a similar sound or spelling include Dublin, Dubois, Dubai, Duban. These share a common prefix and are also used for boys.

Data Sources

Data as of 2024. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).

Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications — National Data, 1917–1967 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames). National-level data includes all names with 5 or more occurrences in a given year.

State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names — State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip). Includes all names with 5 or more occurrences per state per year; rarer names are excluded for privacy.