Girls' name · since 2001
Imagen
Imagen has 33 recorded births since 2001 in federal Social Security data, most heavily in 2001 -- full year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state rankings follow.
- 33
- total births
- 2001–2005
- years on record
- 2000s
- peak decade
- 100%
- born in that decade
33 girls have been named Imagen since 2001, though it isn't currently a top-ranked name.
According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Imagen has been recorded 33 times among girls since 2001, though it is not among the currently most-used girls names, with its heaviest use in the 2000s. This profile covers year-by-year birth trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution, all derived directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 2001 to 2005.
- 33 total births
- 2001–2005 years on record
- 2000s peak decade
- 100% born in that decade
Data updated Jul 2026
The verdict
33 girls have been named Imagen since 2001, peaking in the 2000s, last recorded in 2005.
- 33
- total births
- 2001–2005
- years on record
- 2000s
- peak decade
- 100%
- born in that decade
100% of everyone ever named Imagen was born in this single decade.
12 babies were named Imagen in 2001 - its busiest year on record.
Imagen's usage pattern, beyond the headline number
Imagen splits its recorded history at 2003: 42% of all births land in the more recent half, 58% in the earlier half, an evenly balanced pattern over time. The single quietest year was 2005 (6 births) -- compare that against the 2001 peak of 12 for a sense of just how much the name's popularity has swung.
Imagen at a glance
Last recorded 2005Peak year
Current rank
Active since
Imagen popularity over time
Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 2001–2005
- Peak year (2001)
- 12
- Annual births at peak, across 5 years of records
No longer in the modern top-1000, last recorded 2005.
33 total births across 5 years of SSA records. Peaked in 2001 with 12 births in a single year.
Imagen by decade
Total births in each ten-year window, peak vs trough at a glance
2000s was Imagen's strongest decade.
33 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 100% of all-time use.
Imagen births by decade
Total births in each ten-year window
- 2000s
2000s
33 births
What this shows Peak: 2000s at 33 births (100% of all-time use).
Imagen decade highlights
- Peak decade 33 births
- Decades tracked with recorded births
Frequently Asked Questions
How popular is the name Imagen? ▼
When was Imagen most popular? ▼
How long has the name Imagen been used? ▼
What names are similar to Imagen? ▼
Keep exploring Imagen
Nearby Names Like Imagen
Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Imagen
Compare Imagen side by side: Imagen vs Imani Imagen vs Ima Imagen vs Iman
Related Names
Names with a similar number of total births
Data Sources
Data as of July 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).
According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.
Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 2001–2005 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).
State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).
Cite this page
NameAlmanac Editorial. "Imagen: Baby Name Since 2001 - 33 Births, Peak 2001." NameAlmanac. Accessed via https://namealmanac.com/name/imagen. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.
Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Imagen draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.
Published by
NameAlmanac Editorial
Independent public-data reference that compiles, verifies, and contextualizes official datasets. We do not accept compensation from entities we cover, and every dataset cites its originating public source.