Total births
57
Girls' name · since 2006
Izsabella
Since 2006, U.S. Social Security records show 57 babies named Izsabella, peaking in 2012. See the year-by-year trend, decade totals, and state rankings below, sourced from federal birth data.
- 57
- total births
- 2006–2014
- years on record
- 2010s
- peak decade
- 77%
- born in that decade
Izsabella is not among the current top-ranked girls names; 57 have been recorded since 2006.
According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Izsabella has been recorded 57 times among girls since 2006, though it is not among the currently most-used girls names, with its heaviest use in the 2010s. This profile covers year-by-year birth trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution, all derived directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 2006 to 2014.
- 57 total births
- 2006–2014 years on record
- 2010s peak decade
- 77% born in that decade
Data updated Jul 2026
The verdict
57 girls have been named Izsabella since 2006, peaking in the 2010s, last recorded in 2014.
- 57
- total births
- 2006–2014
- years on record
- 2010s
- peak decade
- 77%
- born in that decade
2010s
Peak decade
77% of everyone ever named Izsabella was born in this single decade.
2012
Single peak year
11 babies were named Izsabella in 2012 - its busiest year on record.
Izsabella's usage pattern, beyond the headline number
Izsabella splits its recorded history at 2011: 67% of all births land in the more recent half, 33% in the earlier half, a lean toward present-day use rather than a passing spike. The single quietest year was 2006 (6 births) -- compare that against the 2012 peak of 11 for a sense of just how much the name's popularity has swung.
Izsabella at a glance
Last recorded 2014Peak year
2012
Current rank
Unranked
Active since
2006
Izsabella popularity over time
Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 2006–2014
- Peak year (2012)
- 11
- Annual births at peak, across 9 years of records
Izsabella by decade
Total births in each ten-year window, peak vs trough at a glance
2010s was Izsabella's strongest decade.
44 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 77% of all-time use.
Izsabella births by decade
Total births in each ten-year window
- 2000s 13
2000s
13 births
- 2010s
2010s
44 births
What this shows Peak: 2010s at 44 births (77% of all-time use).
Frequently Asked Questions
How popular is the name Izsabella? ▼
Izsabella has been given to 57 babies in the U.S. since 2006, according to SSA data. Its last appearance in the data was 2014. 11 babies were born in 2012, its single highest year.
When was Izsabella most popular? ▼
Izsabella was most popular in the 2010s decade with 44 total births. The single peak year was 2012.
How long has the name Izsabella been used? ▼
Izsabella has been recorded in Social Security data since 2006, spanning 9 years of data through 2014.
Keep exploring Izsabella
Related Names
Names with a similar number of total births
Data Sources
Data as of July 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).
According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.
Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 2006–2014 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).
State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).
Cite this page
NameAlmanac Editorial. "Izsabella: Baby Name Since 2006 - 57 Births, Peak 2012." NameAlmanac. Accessed via https://namealmanac.com/name/izsabella. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.
Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Izsabella draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.