Jagdeep — boys' name
44 babies named Jagdeep in U.S. Social Security records since 1979, with the highest year being 1994. Year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state-level rankings drawn from federal birth data.
89% of everyone ever named Jagdeep was born in this single decade.
12 babies were named Jagdeep in 1994 — its busiest year on record.
What the Data Says About Jagdeep
The Social Security Administration has registered 44 babies named Jagdeep between 1979 and 1998, spanning 20 consecutive years of U.S. birth records. As a boy's name, Jagdeep currently falls outside the top 1,000 boys' names for 1998. The name reached its historical peak in 1994, when 12 babies received it in a single year.
Decade-level aggregation shows that Jagdeep performed strongest in the 1990s, accumulating 39 births during that ten-year window. Across the 2 decades of recorded activity, Jagdeep shows a stable profile with only moderate drift from its peak decade. Geographically, the name is most concentrated in California, which accounts for 8 births — the largest state-level total in the dataset — followed by . In total, SSA state-level files list Jagdeep in 1 of the 51 U.S. reporting jurisdictions.
No etymological entry is currently available for Jagdeep in our reference dataset. These figures derive from SSA's annual national and state-level name files, which include any name appearing at least five times in a given year or state-year; names below that threshold are suppressed for privacy and therefore excluded from the totals shown here. The 44 total represents a lower bound — actual usage may be higher in years or states where the count fell below the disclosure floor. This page is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute personal, legal, or naming advice.
Jagdeep at a glance
Last recorded 1998Peak year
Current rank
Active since
Jagdeep popularity over time
Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 1998–1979
- Peak year (1994)
- 12
- Annual births at peak — across 20 years of records
No longer in the modern top-1000 — last recorded 1998.
44 total births across 20 years of SSA records. Peaked in 1994 with 12 births in a single year.
Jagdeep by decade
Total births in each ten-year window — peak vs trough at a glance
- Peak decade
- 1990s
- 39 births that decade — 89% of Jagdeep's all-time total
Jagdeep decade highlights
- Peak decade 39 births
- Runner-up 5 births
- Decades tracked with recorded births
1990s was Jagdeep's strongest decade
39 babies received the name during that ten-year window — about 89% of all-time use.
Jagdeep by state
Where Jagdeep concentrates geographically — total births since 1979
| Rank | State | Visual share | Births | Share of total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | | 8 | 18.2% |
8 of 44 births nationwide.
Top 5 states
- California 18.2% of nationwide
Recorded in 1 of 51 SSA jurisdictions
California accounts for 18.2% of all recorded births nationwide — a relatively diffuse profile for this name.
Frequently Asked Questions
How popular is the name Jagdeep? ▼
When was Jagdeep most popular? ▼
Where is Jagdeep most popular? ▼
How long has the name Jagdeep been used? ▼
What names are similar to Jagdeep? ▼
Keep exploring Jagdeep
Nearby Names Like Jagdeep
Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Jagdeep
Compare Jagdeep side by side: Jagdeep vs Jagger Jagdeep vs Jager Jagdeep vs Jaggar
Related Names
Names with a similar number of total births
Baby Name Guides
Learn more about naming trends and how to use data to choose a name
Explore more names
Data Sources
Data as of 2024. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).
Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications — National Data, 1979–1998 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames). National-level data includes all names with 5 or more occurrences in a given year.
State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names — State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip). Includes all names with 5 or more occurrences per state per year; rarer names are excluded for privacy.