Boys' name · since 2010
Macks
Macks has 30 recorded births since 2010 in federal Social Security data, most heavily in 2014 -- full year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state rankings follow.
- 30
- total births
- 2010–2018
- years on record
- 2010s
- peak decade
- 100%
- born in that decade
Macks sits outside today's top ranks for boys, with 30 recorded since 2010.
According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Macks has been recorded 30 times among boys since 2010, though it is not among the currently most-used boys names, with its heaviest use in the 2010s. This profile covers year-by-year birth trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution, all derived directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 2010 to 2018.
- 30 total births
- 2010–2018 years on record
- 2010s peak decade
- 100% born in that decade
Data updated Jun 2026
The verdict
30 boys have been named Macks since 2010, peaking in the 2010s, last recorded in 2018.
- 30
- total births
- 2010–2018
- years on record
- 2010s
- peak decade
- 100%
- born in that decade
100% of everyone ever named Macks was born in this single decade.
7 babies were named Macks in 2014 - its busiest year on record.
Macks's usage pattern, beyond the headline number
Macks splits its recorded history at 2014: 63% of all births land in the more recent half, 37% in the earlier half, a lean toward present-day use rather than a passing spike. The single quietest year was 2011 (5 births) -- compare that against the 2014 peak of 7 for a sense of just how much the name's popularity has swung.
Macks at a glance
Last recorded 2018Peak year
Current rank
Active since
Macks popularity over time
Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 2010–2018
- Peak year (2014)
- 7
- Annual births at peak, across 9 years of records
No longer in the modern top-1000, last recorded 2018.
30 total births across 9 years of SSA records. Peaked in 2014 with 7 births in a single year.
Macks by decade
Total births in each ten-year window, peak vs trough at a glance
2010s was Macks's strongest decade.
30 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 100% of all-time use.
Macks births by decade
Total births in each ten-year window
- 2010s
2010s
30 births
What this shows Peak: 2010s at 30 births (100% of all-time use).
Macks decade highlights
- Peak decade 30 births
- Decades tracked with recorded births
Frequently Asked Questions
How popular is the name Macks? ▼
When was Macks most popular? ▼
How long has the name Macks been used? ▼
What names are similar to Macks? ▼
Keep exploring Macks
Nearby Names Like Macks
Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Macks
Compare Macks side by side: Macks vs Mack Macks vs Mac Macks vs Mackenzie
Related Names
Names with a similar number of total births
Data Sources
Data as of June 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).
According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.
Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 2010–2018 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).
State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).
Cite this page
NameAlmanac Editorial. "Macks: Baby Name Since 2010 - 30 Births, Peak 2014." NameAlmanac. Accessed via https://namealmanac.com/name/macks. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.
Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Macks draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.
Published by
NameAlmanac Editorial
Independent public-data reference that compiles, verifies, and contextualizes official datasets. We do not accept compensation from entities we cover, and every dataset cites its originating public source.