Boys' name · since 1998

Not

Not has 12 recorded births since 1998 in federal Social Security data, most heavily in 1998 -- full year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state rankings follow.

#32,860 of 45,481
all-time among boys
12
born since 1998
1990s
peak decade

12 boys have been named Not since 1998, though it isn't currently a top-ranked name.

According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Not has been recorded 12 times among boys since 1998, though it is not among the currently most-used boys names, with its heaviest use in the 1990s. This profile covers year-by-year birth trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution, all derived directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 1998 to 2008.

  • #32,860 of 45,481 all-time among boys
  • 12 born since 1998
  • 1990s peak decade

Data updated Aug 2026

The verdict

According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Not ranks #32,860 of 45,481 boys' names by all-time recorded births (highest first). 12 born since 1998, peaking in the 1990s.

#32,860 of 45,481
all-time among boys
12
born since 1998
1990s
peak decade
Below the archive median
All-time archive position

Not's 12 recorded births place it above 27.23% of the 45,481 boys names in the full SSA archive.

1 jurisdictions
State-record footprint

The state file records this name in 1 jurisdictions, led by Arizona.

Not's usage pattern, beyond the headline number

Not splits its recorded history at 2008: 42% of all births land in the more recent half, 58% in the earlier half, an evenly balanced pattern over time. The single quietest year was 2008 (5 births) -- compare that against the 1998 peak of 7 for a sense of just how much the name's popularity has swung.

Not popularity over time

Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 1998–2008

Last recorded 2008
Peak year (1998)
7
Annual births at peak, across 11 years of records
4.555.566.577.5 19982008 5

Not by decade

1990s is the heaviest window (7 births, 58% of the file).

1990s was Not's strongest decade.

7 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 58% of all-time use.

Not births by decade

Total births in each ten-year window

births

What this shows Peak: 1990s at 7 births (58% of all-time use).

Source U.S. Social Security Administration · Baby Names As of August 2026

Not by state

Where Not concentrates geographically, total births since 1998

Regionally concentrated
Top 1 states by recorded births for the name Not
Rank State Visual share Births Share of total
#1 Arizona
7 58.3%
Arizona share of Not's total US births 58.3%

7 of 12 births nationwide.

Frequently Asked Questions

How popular is the name Not?
Not has been given to 12 babies in the U.S. since 1998, according to SSA data. Its archive ordinal is #32,860 of 45,481 among boys' names (total births, highest first). Its last appearance in the data was 2008. 7 babies were born in 1998, its single highest year.
Where does Not sit in the SSA name archive?
According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Not ranks #32,860 of 45,481 boys' names by all-time recorded births (highest first). All-time ordinal matches browse popularity (total births DESC); the current ordinal uses the null SSA file. See /methodology#corpus-placement.
When was Not most popular?
Not was most popular in the 1990s decade with 7 total births. The single peak year was 1998.
Where is Not most popular?
The top states for the name Not are Arizona (7 births).
How long has the name Not been used?
The SSA has tracked Not since 1998 -- 11 years through the most recent 2008 data.
What names are similar to Not?
Names with a similar sound or spelling include Notnamed, Notorious, Notley. These share a common prefix and are also used for boys.

What to do with Not's data

  • Not's usage has stayed within range of its 1990s decade-level peak (7 total births) through the 2000s (5) -- a comparatively stable name, not a fading trend.
  • Arizona records the most Nots (7 births) -- see the full state breakdown if geography matters to your decision. Arizona names

Figures reflect SSA-reported births only; see the methodology above for the privacy-suppression floor.

Keep exploring Not

Nearby Names Like Not

Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Not

Names with a similar number of total births

Nationwide names with similar peak year or record span

Two nationwide peer axes for Not: closest SSA peak year, and closest first→latest record span. Distinct from the spelling and current-rank neighborhoods above.

Peak year is the single SSA year with the most births for that name; record span is first-to-latest year in the national files, not a recommendation or shared origin claim.

Data Sources

Data as of August 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).

According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.

Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 1998–2008 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).

State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).

Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Not draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.