Girls' name · since 2005
Poorvi
30 babies named Poorvi in U.S. Social Security records since 2005, with the highest year being 2006. Year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state-level rankings drawn from federal birth data.
- 30
- total births
- 2005–2016
- years on record
- 2010s
- peak decade
- 57%
- born in that decade
Poorvi sits outside today's top ranks for girls, with 30 recorded since 2005.
Poorvi has 30 recorded births among girls since 2005, per the U.S. Social Security Administration, though it falls outside today's most-used girls names, busiest in the 2010s -- see the year-by-year trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution below, all drawn directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 2005 to 2016.
- 30 total births
- 2005–2016 years on record
- 2010s peak decade
- 57% born in that decade
Data updated Jul 2026
The verdict
30 girls have been named Poorvi since 2005, peaking in the 2010s, last recorded in 2016.
- 30
- total births
- 2005–2016
- years on record
- 2010s
- peak decade
- 57%
- born in that decade
57% of everyone ever named Poorvi was born in this single decade.
8 babies were named Poorvi in 2006 - its busiest year on record.
Poorvi's usage pattern, beyond the headline number
Poorvi splits its recorded history at 2012: 57% of all births land in the more recent half, 43% in the earlier half, an evenly balanced pattern over time. The single quietest year was 2005 (5 births) -- compare that against the 2006 peak of 8 for a sense of just how much the name's popularity has swung.
Poorvi at a glance
Last recorded 2016Peak year
Current rank
Active since
Poorvi popularity over time
Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 2005–2016
- Peak year (2006)
- 8
- Annual births at peak, across 12 years of records
No longer in the modern top-1000, last recorded 2016.
30 total births across 12 years of SSA records. Peaked in 2006 with 8 births in a single year.
Poorvi by decade
Total births in each ten-year window, peak vs trough at a glance
2010s was Poorvi's strongest decade.
17 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 57% of all-time use.
Poorvi births by decade
Total births in each ten-year window
- 2000s
2000s
13 births
- 2010s
2010s
17 births
What this shows Peak: 2010s at 17 births (57% of all-time use).
Poorvi decade highlights
- Peak decade 17 births
- Runner-up 13 births
- Decades tracked with recorded births
Frequently Asked Questions
How popular is the name Poorvi? ▼
When was Poorvi most popular? ▼
How long has the name Poorvi been used? ▼
What names are similar to Poorvi? ▼
Keep exploring Poorvi
Nearby Names Like Poorvi
Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Poorvi
Compare Poorvi side by side: Poorvi vs Pooja Poorvi vs Poonam Poorvi vs Poorna
Related Names
Names with a similar number of total births
Data Sources
Data as of July 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).
According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.
Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 2005–2016 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).
State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).
Cite this page
NameAlmanac Editorial. "Poorvi: Baby Name Since 2005 - 30 Births, Peak 2006." NameAlmanac. Accessed via https://namealmanac.com/name/poorvi. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.
Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Poorvi draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.
Published by
NameAlmanac Editorial
Independent public-data reference that compiles, verifies, and contextualizes official datasets. We do not accept compensation from entities we cover, and every dataset cites its originating public source.