US rank #8401 Unisex name Peak 1994 435 births

Rajah — #8401 US boys' name

435 babies named Rajah in U.S. Social Security records since 1951, with the highest year being 1994. Year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state-level rankings drawn from federal birth data.

1950s51970s321980s351990s892000s892010s1232020s62
#8401
of 14,243 boys in use

More common than 41% of names given to boys today.

2010s
Peak decade

28% of everyone ever named Rajah was born in this single decade.

1994
Single peak year

24 babies were named Rajah in 1994 — its busiest year on record.

What the Data Says About Rajah

The Social Security Administration has registered 435 babies named Rajah between 1951 and 2024, spanning 74 consecutive years of U.S. birth records. As a boy's name, Rajah currently holds the #8401 rank among boys for 2024. The name reached its historical peak in 1994, when 24 babies received it in a single year. Rajah is classified as unisex in SSA records: the opposite-sex variant accounts for 175 additional births since 1991.

Decade-level aggregation shows that Rajah performed strongest in the 2010s, accumulating 123 births during that ten-year window. Across the 7 decades of recorded activity, Rajah shows notable generational variation in parental adoption.

No etymological entry is currently available for Rajah in our reference dataset. These figures derive from SSA's annual national and state-level name files, which include any name appearing at least five times in a given year or state-year; names below that threshold are suppressed for privacy and therefore excluded from the totals shown here. The 435 total represents a lower bound — actual usage may be higher in years or states where the count fell below the disclosure floor. This page is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute personal, legal, or naming advice.

Rajah at a glance

Outside the top 1,000

Total births

435

Since 1951

74 years of records

Peak year

1994

24 births that year

Strongest decade: 2010s

Current rank

#8,401

Among boys

As of 2024

Active since

1951

Recorded for 74 years

Last year on file: 2024

Rajah popularity over time — boys

Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 2024–1951

Outside the top 1,000
Peak year (1994)
24
Annual births at peak — across 74 years of records
0510152025 202420182012200619991993198619741951 5

Rajah popularity over time — girls

175 total births recorded since 1991 (Rajah as girls' name)

Unisex variant — 175 births
0510152025 20222013200820042000199719931991 5

Rajah by decade

Total births in each ten-year window — peak vs trough at a glance

Peak: 2010s
Peak decade
2010s
123 births that decade — 28% of Rajah's all-time total
1950s51970s321980s351990s892000s892010s1232020s62

Frequently Asked Questions

How popular is the name Rajah?
435 babies have been named Rajah since 1951. It currently ranks #8401 among boys. The peak year was 1994 with 24 births.
When was Rajah most popular?
Rajah was most popular in the 2010s decade with 123 total births. The single peak year was 1994.
Is Rajah a unisex name?
Yes, Rajah is used for both boys and girls. As a boy's name it has 435 births, and as a girl's name it has 175 births.
How long has the name Rajah been used?
Rajah has been recorded in Social Security data since 1951, spanning 74 years of data through 2024.
What names are similar to Rajah?
Names with a similar sound or spelling include Raj, Rajan, Raja, Rajiv, and 4 more. These share a common prefix and are also used for boys.

Data Sources

Data as of 2024. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).

Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications — National Data, 1951–2024 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames). National-level data includes all names with 5 or more occurrences in a given year.

State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names — State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip). Includes all names with 5 or more occurrences per state per year; rarer names are excluded for privacy.