Sloka — #10846 US girls' name
240 babies named Sloka in U.S. Social Security records since 2009, with the highest year being 2013. Year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state-level rankings drawn from federal birth data.
More common than 39% of names given to girls today.
74% of everyone ever named Sloka was born in this single decade.
25 babies were named Sloka in 2013 — its busiest year on record.
What the Data Says About Sloka
The Social Security Administration has registered 240 babies named Sloka between 2009 and 2024, spanning 16 consecutive years of U.S. birth records. As a girl's name, Sloka currently holds the #10846 rank among girls for 2024. The name reached its historical peak in 2013, when 25 babies received it in a single year.
Decade-level aggregation shows that Sloka performed strongest in the 2010s, accumulating 178 births during that ten-year window. Across the 3 decades of recorded activity, Sloka shows a clear decline from its mid-century high. Geographically, the name is most concentrated in California, which accounts for 5 births — the largest state-level total in the dataset — followed by . In total, SSA state-level files list Sloka in 1 of the 51 U.S. reporting jurisdictions.
No etymological entry is currently available for Sloka in our reference dataset. These figures derive from SSA's annual national and state-level name files, which include any name appearing at least five times in a given year or state-year; names below that threshold are suppressed for privacy and therefore excluded from the totals shown here. The 240 total represents a lower bound — actual usage may be higher in years or states where the count fell below the disclosure floor. This page is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute personal, legal, or naming advice.
Sloka at a glance
Outside the top 1,000Peak year
Current rank
Active since
Sloka popularity over time
Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 2024–2009
- Peak year (2013)
- 25
- Annual births at peak — across 16 years of records
Currently ranks #10846 among girls.
240 total births across 16 years of SSA records. Peaked in 2013 with 25 births in a single year.
Sloka by decade
Total births in each ten-year window — peak vs trough at a glance
- Peak decade
- 2010s
- 178 births that decade — 74% of Sloka's all-time total
Sloka decade highlights
- Peak decade 178 births
- Runner-up 50 births
- Modern era share 2010s + 2020s
- Decades tracked with recorded births
2010s was Sloka's strongest decade
178 babies received the name during that ten-year window — about 74% of all-time use.
Sloka by state
Where Sloka concentrates geographically — total births since 2009
| Rank | State | Visual share | Births | Share of total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | | 5 | 2.1% |
5 of 240 births nationwide.
Top 5 states
- California 2.1% of nationwide
Recorded in 1 of 51 SSA jurisdictions
California accounts for 2.1% of all recorded births nationwide — a relatively diffuse profile for this name.
Frequently Asked Questions
How popular is the name Sloka? ▼
When was Sloka most popular? ▼
Where is Sloka most popular? ▼
How long has the name Sloka been used? ▼
What names are similar to Sloka? ▼
Keep exploring Sloka
Nearby Names Like Sloka
Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Sloka
Compare Sloka side by side: Sloka vs Sloane Sloka vs Sloan Sloka vs Slone
Related Names
Names with a similar popularity rank to Sloka
Baby Name Guides
Learn more about naming trends and how to use data to choose a name
Explore more names
Data Sources
Data as of 2024. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).
Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications — National Data, 2009–2024 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames). National-level data includes all names with 5 or more occurrences in a given year.
State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names — State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip). Includes all names with 5 or more occurrences per state per year; rarer names are excluded for privacy.