Boys' name · since 1895

Harm

320 babies named Harm in U.S. Social Security records since 1895, with the highest year being 1917. Year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state-level rankings drawn from federal birth data.

#10,223 of 45,481
all-time among boys
320
born since 1895
1920s
peak decade

320 boys have been named Harm since 1895, though it isn't currently a top-ranked name.

Social Security Administration records show Harm recorded 320 times among boys since 1895, though it doesn't currently rank among the most-used boys names, peaking in the 1920s. This profile derives year-by-year birth trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 1895 to 1940.

  • #10,223 of 45,481 all-time among boys
  • 320 born since 1895
  • 1920s peak decade

Data updated Aug 2026

The verdict

According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Harm ranks #10,223 of 45,481 boys' names by all-time recorded births (highest first). 320 born since 1895, peaking in the 1920s.

#10,223 of 45,481
all-time among boys
320
born since 1895
1920s
peak decade
Above the archive median
All-time archive position

Harm's 320 recorded births place it above 77.5% of the 45,481 boys names in the full SSA archive.

1 jurisdictions
State-record footprint

The state file records this name in 1 jurisdictions, led by Iowa.

Harm's usage pattern, beyond the headline number

Divide Harm's SSA record in two at 1923 and the more recent half accounts for 49% of all births, the earlier half the remaining 51%, a genuinely balanced usage pattern. Its calmest year was 1895, with only 5 births recorded -- set against the 1917 peak of 18, that's the full swing in one name's fortunes.

Harm popularity over time

Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 1895–1940

Last recorded 1940
Peak year (1917)
18
Annual births at peak, across 46 years of records
05101520 18951912191719221927193319381940 5

Harm by decade

1920s is the heaviest window (114 births, 36% of the file).

1920s was Harm's strongest decade.

114 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 36% of all-time use.

Harm births by decade

Total births in each ten-year window

births

What this shows Peak: 1920s at 114 births (36% of all-time use).

Source U.S. Social Security Administration · Baby Names As of August 2026

Harm by state

Where Harm concentrates geographically, total births since 1895

Geographically diffuse
Top 1 states by recorded births for the name Harm
Rank State Visual share Births Share of total
#1 Iowa
13 4.1%
Iowa share of Harm's total US births 4.1%

13 of 320 births nationwide.

Frequently Asked Questions

How popular is the name Harm?
320 babies have been named Harm since 1895. All-time, it sits at #10,223 of 45,481 boys' names by recorded births. It was last recorded in 1940. The peak year was 1917 with 18 births.
Where does Harm sit in the SSA name archive?
According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Harm ranks #10,223 of 45,481 boys' names by all-time recorded births (highest first). All-time ordinal matches browse popularity (total births DESC); the current ordinal uses the null SSA file. See /methodology#corpus-placement.
When was Harm most popular?
Harm was most popular in the 1920s decade with 114 total births. The single peak year was 1917.
Where is Harm most popular?
The top states for the name Harm are Iowa (13 births).
How long has the name Harm been used?
Harm has been recorded in Social Security data since 1895, spanning 46 years of data through 1940.
What names are similar to Harm?
Names with a similar sound or spelling include Harold, Harry, Harvey, Harrison, and 4 more. These share a common prefix and are also used for boys.

What to do with Harm's data

  • Harm's decade-level peak was the 1920s (114 total births); usage has since declined to 5 in the 1940s -- if you're weighing a "classic revival" angle, the trend line argues against it.
  • Iowa records the most Harms (13 births) -- see the full state breakdown if geography matters to your decision. Iowa names

Figures reflect SSA-reported births only; see the methodology above for the privacy-suppression floor.

Keep exploring Harm

Nearby Names Like Harm

Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Harm

Names with a similar number of total births

Nationwide names with similar peak year or record span

Two nationwide peer axes for Harm: closest SSA peak year, and closest first→latest record span. Distinct from the spelling and current-rank neighborhoods above.

Peak year is the single SSA year with the most births for that name; record span is first-to-latest year in the national files, not a recommendation or shared origin claim.

Data Sources

Data as of August 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).

According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.

Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 1895–1940 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).

State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).

Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Harm draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.