Girls' name · since 1883
Lossie
Lossie has 1,189 recorded births since 1883 in federal Social Security data, most heavily in 1921 -- full year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state rankings follow.
- 1,189
- total births
- 1883–1961
- years on record
- 1920s
- peak decade
- 26%
- born in that decade
1,189 girls have been named Lossie since 1883, though it isn't currently a top-ranked name.
Social Security Administration records show Lossie recorded 1,189 times among girls since 1883, though it doesn't currently rank among the most-used girls names, peaking in the 1920s. This profile derives year-by-year birth trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 1883 to 1961.
- 1,189 total births
- 1883–1961 years on record
- 1920s peak decade
- 26% born in that decade
Data updated Jun 2026
The verdict
1,189 girls have been named Lossie since 1883, peaking in the 1920s, last recorded in 1961.
- 1,189
- total births
- 1883–1961
- years on record
- 1920s
- peak decade
- 26%
- born in that decade
26% of everyone ever named Lossie was born in this single decade.
44 babies were named Lossie in 1921 - its busiest year on record.
Lossie's usage pattern, beyond the headline number
Splitting Lossie's full recorded timeline at 1924, 47% of its total births fall in the more recent half of the record versus 53% in the earlier half -- a fairly even split across the full record. Its quietest year on record was 1883, with just 5 recorded births -- worth weighing against the 1921 peak of 44 to see the full range of the name's swing in popularity.
Lossie at a glance
Last recorded 1961Peak year
Current rank
Active since
Lossie popularity over time - girls
Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 1883–1961
- Peak year (1921)
- 44
- Annual births at peak, across 79 years of records
No longer in the modern top-1000, last recorded 1961.
1,189 total births across 79 years of SSA records. Peaked in 1921 with 44 births in a single year.
Lossie popularity over time - boys
24 total births recorded since 1914 (Lossie as boys' name)
Unisex use remains the minority pattern
The boys' variant of Lossie accounts for 2% of total recorded use across both genders.
Lossie by decade
Total births in each ten-year window, peak vs trough at a glance
1920s was Lossie's strongest decade.
309 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 26% of all-time use.
Lossie births by decade
Total births in each ten-year window
- 1880s 16
1880s
16 births
- 1890s 63
1890s
63 births
- 1900s
1900s
140 births
- 1910s
1910s
268 births
- 1920s
1920s
309 births
- 1930s
1930s
208 births
- 1940s 106
1940s
106 births
- 1950s 74
1950s
74 births
- 1960s 5
1960s
5 births
What this shows Peak: 1920s at 309 births (26% of all-time use).
Lossie decade highlights
- Peak decade 309 births
- Runner-up 268 births
- Modern era share 2010s + 2020s
- Decades tracked with recorded births
How Lossie compares to similarly-sized names
Years in SSA records vs. share of all-time use concentrated in the single peak year, among 15 girls names closest to Lossie's total volume
Lossie vs 15 similarly-sized girls names
Lossie by state
Where Lossie concentrates geographically, total births since 1883
| Rank | State | Visual share | Births | Share of total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | North Carolina | | 392 | 33.0% |
| #2 | Georgia | | 24 | 2.0% |
| #3 | Tennessee | | 10 | 0.8% |
| #4 | Alabama | | 6 | 0.5% |
| #5 | South Carolina | | 5 | 0.4% |
392 of 1,189 births nationwide. Compared to a flat distribution across 5 reporting states.
Top 5 states
- North Carolina 33.0% of nationwide
- Georgia 2.0% of nationwide
- Tennessee 0.8% of nationwide
- Alabama 0.5% of nationwide
- South Carolina 0.4% of nationwide
Recorded in 5 of 51 SSA jurisdictions
North Carolina accounts for 33.0% of all recorded births nationwide - a strong regional concentration for this name.
Frequently Asked Questions
How popular is the name Lossie? ▼
When was Lossie most popular? ▼
Where is Lossie most popular? ▼
How long has the name Lossie been used? ▼
What names are similar to Lossie? ▼
What to do with Lossie's data
- Lossie's decade-level peak was the 1920s (309 total births); usage has since declined to 5 in the 1960s -- if you're weighing a "classic revival" angle, the trend line argues against it.
- North Carolina records the most Lossies (392 births) -- see the full state breakdown if geography matters to your decision. North Carolina names
- Weighing it against an alternative? Put two names side by side. Compare names
Figures reflect SSA-reported births only; see the methodology above for the privacy-suppression floor.
Keep exploring Lossie
Nearby Names Like Lossie
Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Lossie
Compare Lossie side by side: Lossie vs Losaline
Related Names
Names with a similar number of total births
Data Sources
Data as of June 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).
According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.
Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 1883–1961 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).
State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).
Cite this page
NameAlmanac Editorial. "Lossie: Baby Name Since 1883 - 1,189 Births, Peak 1921." NameAlmanac. Accessed via https://namealmanac.com/name/lossie. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.
Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Lossie draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.
Published by
NameAlmanac Editorial
Independent public-data reference that compiles, verifies, and contextualizes official datasets. We do not accept compensation from entities we cover, and every dataset cites its originating public source.