Boys' name · since 1884
Son
Son has 1,061 recorded births since 1884 in federal Social Security data, most heavily in 1982 -- full year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state rankings follow.
- 1,061
- total births
- 1884–2019
- years on record
- 1980s
- peak decade
- 27%
- born in that decade
Son is not among the current top-ranked boys names; 1,061 have been recorded since 1884.
Son has 1,061 recorded births among boys since 1884, per the U.S. Social Security Administration, though it falls outside today's most-used boys names, busiest in the 1980s -- see the year-by-year trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution below, all drawn directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 1884 to 2019.
- 1,061 total births
- 1884–2019 years on record
- 1980s peak decade
- 27% born in that decade
Data updated Jun 2026
The verdict
1,061 boys have been named Son since 1884, peaking in the 1980s, last recorded in 2019.
- 1,061
- total births
- 1884–2019
- years on record
- 1980s
- peak decade
- 27%
- born in that decade
27% of everyone ever named Son was born in this single decade.
41 babies were named Son in 1982 - its busiest year on record.
Son's usage pattern, beyond the headline number
Splitting Son's full recorded timeline at 1937, 59% of its total births fall in the more recent half of the record versus 41% in the earlier half -- a fairly even split across the full record. Its quietest year on record was 1890, with just 5 recorded births -- worth weighing against the 1982 peak of 41 to see the full range of the name's swing in popularity.
Son at a glance
Last recorded 2019Peak year
Current rank
Active since
Son popularity over time - boys
Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 1884–2019
- Peak year (1982)
- 41
- Annual births at peak, across 136 years of records
No longer in the modern top-1000, last recorded 2019.
1,061 total births across 136 years of SSA records. Peaked in 1982 with 41 births in a single year.
Son popularity over time - girls
5 total births recorded since 1957 (Son as girls' name)
Unisex use remains the minority pattern
The girls' variant of Son accounts for 0% of total recorded use across both genders.
Son by decade
Total births in each ten-year window, peak vs trough at a glance
1980s was Son's strongest decade.
288 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 27% of all-time use.
Son births by decade
Total births in each ten-year window
- 1880s 26
1880s
26 births
- 1890s 92
1890s
92 births
- 1900s
1900s
119 births
- 1910s
1910s
138 births
- 1920s 64
1920s
64 births
- 1930s 5
1930s
5 births
- 1940s 5
1940s
5 births
- 1970s 65
1970s
65 births
- 1980s
1980s
288 births
- 1990s
1990s
158 births
- 2000s 73
2000s
73 births
- 2010s 28
2010s
28 births
What this shows Peak: 1980s at 288 births (27% of all-time use).
Son decade highlights
- Peak decade 288 births
- Runner-up 158 births
- Modern era share 2010s + 2020s
- Decades tracked with recorded births
How Son compares to similarly-sized names
Years in SSA records vs. share of all-time use concentrated in the single peak year, among 15 boys names closest to Son's total volume
Son vs 15 similarly-sized boys names
Son by state
Where Son concentrates geographically, total births since 1884
| Rank | State | Visual share | Births | Share of total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | | 165 | 15.6% |
| #2 | Texas | | 26 | 2.5% |
| #3 | Georgia | | 11 | 1.0% |
| #4 | Tennessee | | 6 | 0.6% |
| #5 | Alabama | | 5 | 0.5% |
| #6 | Louisiana | | 5 | 0.5% |
| #7 | Mississippi | | 5 | 0.5% |
165 of 1,061 births nationwide. Compared to a flat distribution across 7 reporting states.
Top 5 states
- California 15.6% of nationwide
- Texas 2.5% of nationwide
- Georgia 1.0% of nationwide
- Tennessee 0.6% of nationwide
- Alabama 0.5% of nationwide
Recorded in 7 of 51 SSA jurisdictions
California accounts for 15.6% of all recorded births nationwide - a relatively diffuse profile for this name.
Frequently Asked Questions
How popular is the name Son? ▼
When was Son most popular? ▼
Where is Son most popular? ▼
How long has the name Son been used? ▼
What names are similar to Son? ▼
What to do with Son's data
- Son's decade-level peak was the 1980s (288 total births); usage has since declined to 28 in the 2010s -- if you're weighing a "classic revival" angle, the trend line argues against it.
- California records the most Sons (165 births) -- see the full state breakdown if geography matters to your decision. California names
- Weighing it against an alternative? Put two names side by side. Compare names
Figures reflect SSA-reported births only; see the methodology above for the privacy-suppression floor.
Keep exploring Son
Nearby Names Like Son
Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Son
Compare Son side by side: Son vs Sonny Son vs Sonnie Son vs Sony
Related Names
Names with a similar number of total births
Data Sources
Data as of June 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).
According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.
Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 1884–2019 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).
State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).
Cite this page
NameAlmanac Editorial. "Son: Baby Name Since 1884 - 1,061 Births, Peak 1982." NameAlmanac. Accessed via https://namealmanac.com/name/son. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.
Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Son draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.
Published by
NameAlmanac Editorial
Independent public-data reference that compiles, verifies, and contextualizes official datasets. We do not accept compensation from entities we cover, and every dataset cites its originating public source.