Ankush — boys' name
163 babies named Ankush in U.S. Social Security records since 1986, with the highest year being 2003. Year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state-level rankings drawn from federal birth data.
43% of everyone ever named Ankush was born in this single decade.
13 babies were named Ankush in 2003 — its busiest year on record.
What the Data Says About Ankush
The Social Security Administration has registered 163 babies named Ankush between 1986 and 2017, spanning 32 consecutive years of U.S. birth records. As a boy's name, Ankush currently falls outside the top 1,000 boys' names for 2017. The name reached its historical peak in 2003, when 13 babies received it in a single year.
Decade-level aggregation shows that Ankush performed strongest in the 1990s, accumulating 70 births during that ten-year window. Across the 4 decades of recorded activity, Ankush shows a clear decline from its mid-century high. Geographically, the name is most concentrated in California, which accounts for 5 births — the largest state-level total in the dataset — followed by . In total, SSA state-level files list Ankush in 1 of the 51 U.S. reporting jurisdictions.
No etymological entry is currently available for Ankush in our reference dataset. These figures derive from SSA's annual national and state-level name files, which include any name appearing at least five times in a given year or state-year; names below that threshold are suppressed for privacy and therefore excluded from the totals shown here. The 163 total represents a lower bound — actual usage may be higher in years or states where the count fell below the disclosure floor. This page is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute personal, legal, or naming advice.
Ankush at a glance
Last recorded 2017Peak year
Current rank
Active since
Ankush popularity over time
Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 2017–1986
- Peak year (2003)
- 13
- Annual births at peak — across 32 years of records
No longer in the modern top-1000 — last recorded 2017.
163 total births across 32 years of SSA records. Peaked in 2003 with 13 births in a single year.
Ankush by decade
Total births in each ten-year window — peak vs trough at a glance
- Peak decade
- 1990s
- 70 births that decade — 43% of Ankush's all-time total
Ankush decade highlights
- Peak decade 70 births
- Runner-up 54 births
- Modern era share 2010s + 2020s
- Decades tracked with recorded births
1990s was Ankush's strongest decade
70 babies received the name during that ten-year window — about 43% of all-time use.
Ankush by state
Where Ankush concentrates geographically — total births since 1986
| Rank | State | Visual share | Births | Share of total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | | 5 | 3.1% |
5 of 163 births nationwide.
Top 5 states
- California 3.1% of nationwide
Recorded in 1 of 51 SSA jurisdictions
California accounts for 3.1% of all recorded births nationwide — a relatively diffuse profile for this name.
Frequently Asked Questions
How popular is the name Ankush? ▼
When was Ankush most popular? ▼
Where is Ankush most popular? ▼
How long has the name Ankush been used? ▼
What names are similar to Ankush? ▼
Keep exploring Ankush
Nearby Names Like Ankush
Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Ankush
Compare Ankush side by side: Ankush vs Ankit Ankush vs Ankur Ankush vs Ankith
Related Names
Names with a similar number of total births
Baby Name Guides
Learn more about naming trends and how to use data to choose a name
Explore more names
Data Sources
Data as of 2024. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).
Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications — National Data, 1986–2017 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames). National-level data includes all names with 5 or more occurrences in a given year.
State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names — State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip). Includes all names with 5 or more occurrences per state per year; rarer names are excluded for privacy.