Boys' name · since 1916
Fields
Since 1916, U.S. Social Security records show 200 babies named Fields, peaking in 2025. See the year-by-year trend, decade totals, and state rankings below, sourced from federal birth data.
- #5692
- among boys today
- 200
- born since 1916
- 2020s
- peak decade
- 60%
- more common than other boys
Fields currently ranks #5692 among boys' names in America, with 200 babies recorded since 1916.
Fields has 200 recorded births among boys since 1916, per the U.S. Social Security Administration, ranked #5692 as of the latest data, more common than 60% of boys, busiest in the 2020s -- see the year-by-year trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution below, all drawn directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 1916 to 2025.
- #5692 among boys today
- 200 born since 1916
- 2020s peak decade
- 60% more common than other boys
Data updated Jun 2026
The verdict
Fields is currently the #5692 boys' name in America, more common than 60% of boys - 200 born since 1916, peaking in the 2020s.
- #5692
- among boys today
- 200
- born since 1916
- 2020s
- peak decade
- 60%
- more common than other boys
Fields vs. every other boys name in current SSA rankings
More common than 60% of names given to boys today.
54% of everyone ever named Fields was born in this single decade.
32 babies were named Fields in 2025 - its busiest year on record.
How Fields compares
200 38th percentile among 14,294 names currently given to boys
Based on all-time total births among currently-ranked boys names. Names with fewer occurrences are grouped into wider buckets on the right.
Source U.S. Social Security Administration, national baby name data
How the numbers stack up
Fields's all-time total is 46% below the median boys name, and Liam still leads by a wide margin.
| Metric | Fields | Median boys name (Elchonon) | #1 boys name (Liam) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All-time total births | 200 | 367 | 358,536 |
| Peak-year births | 32 | 23 | 22,252 |
Fields's usage pattern, beyond the headline number
Divide Fields's SSA record in two at 2016 and the more recent half accounts for 72% of all births, the earlier half the remaining 28%, consistent with a name still gaining ground rather than fading. Its calmest year was 1922, with only 5 births recorded -- set against the 2025 peak of 32, that's the full swing in one name's fortunes.
Fields at a glance
Outside the top 1,000Peak year
Current rank
Active since
Fields popularity over time
Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 1916–2025
- Peak year (2025)
- 32
- Annual births at peak, across 110 years of records
Currently ranks #5692 among boys.
200 total births across 110 years of SSA records. Peaked in 2025 with 32 births in a single year.
Fields by decade
Total births in each ten-year window, peak vs trough at a glance
2020s was Fields's strongest decade.
107 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 54% of all-time use.
Fields births by decade
Total births in each ten-year window
- 1910s 6
1910s
6 births
- 1920s 26
1920s
26 births
- 1940s 5
1940s
5 births
- 1950s 5
1950s
5 births
- 2010s
2010s
51 births
- 2020s
2020s
107 births
What this shows Peak: 2020s at 107 births (54% of all-time use).
Fields decade highlights
- Peak decade 107 births
- Runner-up 51 births
- Modern era share 2010s + 2020s
- Decades tracked with recorded births
Fields by state
Where Fields concentrates geographically, total births since 1916
| Rank | State | Visual share | Births | Share of total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | North Carolina | | 5 | 2.5% |
5 of 200 births nationwide.
Top 5 states
- North Carolina 2.5% of nationwide
Recorded in 1 of 51 SSA jurisdictions
North Carolina accounts for 2.5% of all recorded births nationwide - a relatively diffuse profile for this name.
Frequently Asked Questions
How popular is the name Fields? ▼
When was Fields most popular? ▼
Where is Fields most popular? ▼
How long has the name Fields been used? ▼
What names are similar to Fields? ▼
What to do with Fields's data
- North Carolina records the most Fieldss (5 births) -- see the full state breakdown if geography matters to your decision. North Carolina names
- Weighing it against an alternative? Put two names side by side. Compare names
Figures reflect SSA-reported births only; see the methodology above for the privacy-suppression floor.
Keep exploring Fields
Nearby Names Like Fields
Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Fields
Compare Fields side by side: Fields vs Fielding Fields vs Field Fields vs Fielder
Related Names
Names with a similar popularity rank to Fields
Data Sources
Data as of June 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).
According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.
Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 1916–2025 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).
State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).
Cite this page
NameAlmanac Editorial. "Fields: #5692 Boys' Name - 200 Births, Peak 2025." NameAlmanac. Accessed via https://namealmanac.com/name/fields. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.
Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Fields draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.
Published by
NameAlmanac Editorial
Independent public-data reference that compiles, verifies, and contextualizes official datasets. We do not accept compensation from entities we cover, and every dataset cites its originating public source.