Unisex name · since 1881

Garnett

Since 1881, U.S. Social Security records show 3,857 babies named Garnett, peaking in 1920. See the year-by-year trend, decade totals, and state rankings below, sourced from federal birth data.

#2,152 of 45,481
all-time among boys
#12,033 of 13,930
2025 SSA year
3,857
born since 1881
1920s
peak decade

Garnett currently ranks #12033 among unisex names in America, with 3,857 babies recorded since 1881.

According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Garnett has been recorded 3,857 times among boys since 1881, currently ranked #12033 nationally and more common than 14% of boys, with its heaviest use in the 1920s. This profile covers year-by-year birth trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution, all derived directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 1881 to 2025.

  • #2,152 of 45,481 all-time among boys
  • #12,033 of 13,930 2025 SSA year
  • 3,857 born since 1881
  • 1920s peak decade

Data updated Aug 2026

The verdict

According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Garnett ranks #2,152 of 45,481 boys' names by all-time recorded births (highest first) and #12,033 of 13,930 among boys' names in 2025. 3,857 born since 1881, peaking in the 1920s.

#2,152 of 45,481
all-time among boys
#12,033 of 13,930
2025 SSA year
3,857
born since 1881
1920s
peak decade
0%100%Median name50%13.6%
Garnett vs. every other boys name in current SSA rankings
Upper archive tier
All-time archive position

Garnett's 3,857 recorded births place it above 95.26% of the 45,481 boys names in the full SSA archive.

11 jurisdictions
State-record footprint

11 jurisdictions carry state-level records, led by Virginia.

How Garnett compares

3,857 Top 15% higher than 85% of 13,930 names currently given to boys

Based on all-time total births among currently-ranked boys names. Names with fewer occurrences are grouped into wider buckets on the right.

Source U.S. Social Security Administration, national baby name data

How the numbers stack up

Garnett's all-time total is 10x the median boys name, and Liam still leads by a wide margin.

Metric Garnett Median boys name (Takari) #1 boys name (Liam)
All-time total births 3,857 369 358,536
Peak-year births 87 34 22,252

Garnett's usage pattern, beyond the headline number

Splitting Garnett's full recorded timeline at 1950, 33% of its total births fall in the more recent half of the record versus 67% in the earlier half -- the name was more prevalent in its earlier era than it is today. Its quietest year on record was 1881, with just 5 recorded births -- worth weighing against the 1920 peak of 87 to see the full range of the name's swing in popularity.

Garnett popularity over time - boys

Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 1881–2025

Outside the top 1,000
Peak year (1920)
87
Annual births at peak, across 145 years of records
020406080100 188119001917193419511968198620032025 5

Garnett popularity over time - girls

2,784 total births recorded since 1889 (Garnett as girls' name)

Unisex variant - 2,784 births
050100150 188919011913192519371949196119731991 5

Garnett by decade

1920s is the heaviest window (729 births, 19% of the file).

1920s was Garnett's strongest decade.

729 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 19% of all-time use.

Garnett births by decade

Total births in each ten-year window

births

What this shows Peak: 1920s at 729 births (19% of all-time use).

Source U.S. Social Security Administration · Baby Names As of August 2026

How Garnett compares to similarly-sized names

Years in SSA records vs. share of all-time use concentrated in the single peak year, among 15 boys names closest to Garnett's total volume

Garnett vs 15 similarly-sized boys names Scatter plot of 16 data points. 0%2%4%6%8%10%12% 050100150200 New & already peakedOld name, single-era peakNew & still diversifyingLong history, steady all along Years in SSA records % of total births in the single peak year -45, 4.8%-75, 3.5%-134, 3%-109, 6%-140, 3.1%-122, 2.3%-38, 7.3%-146, 2.4%-51, 9.8%-56, 4.5%-114, 6.7%-146, 1.7%-128, 2%-56, 7.2%-54, 7.3%Garnett-145, 2.3%Garnett
Garnett vs 15 similarly-sized boys names

Garnett by state

Where Garnett concentrates geographically, total births since 1881

Geographically diffuse
Top 8 states by recorded births for the name Garnett
Rank State Visual share Births Share of total
#1 Virginia
732 19.0%
#2 Kentucky
572 14.8%
#3 Georgia
218 5.7%
#4 Missouri
35 0.9%
#5 West Virginia
28 0.7%
#6 North Carolina
23 0.6%
#7 Texas
17 0.4%
#8 Tennessee
15 0.4%
Virginia share of Garnett's total US births 19.0%
Even split

732 of 3,857 births nationwide. Compared to a flat distribution across 11 reporting states.

Garnett appears in 11 states. Explore state details →

Frequently Asked Questions

How popular is the name Garnett?
Garnett has been given to 3,857 babies in the U.S. since 1881, according to SSA data. Its archive ordinal is #2,152 of 45,481 among boys' names (total births, highest first). Among boys in 2025, it is #12,033 of 13,930. 87 babies were born in 1920, its single highest year.
Where does Garnett sit in the SSA name archive?
According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Garnett ranks #2,152 of 45,481 boys' names by all-time recorded births (highest first) and #12,033 of 13,930 among boys' names in 2025. All-time ordinal matches browse popularity (total births DESC); the current ordinal uses the 2025 SSA file. See /methodology#corpus-placement.
When was Garnett most popular?
Garnett was most popular in the 1920s decade with 729 total births. The single peak year was 1920.
Where is Garnett most popular?
The top states for the name Garnett are Virginia (732 births), Kentucky (572 births), Georgia (218 births).
Is Garnett a unisex name?
Yes, Garnett is used for both boys and girls. As a boy's name it has 3,857 births, and as a girl's name it has 2,784 births.
How long has the name Garnett been used?
The SSA has tracked Garnett since 1881 -- 145 years through the most recent 2025 data.
What names are similar to Garnett?
Names with a similar sound or spelling include Gary, Garrett, Garry, Garland, and 4 more. These share a common prefix and are also used for boys.

What to do with Garnett's data

  • Garnett's decade-level peak was the 1920s (729 total births); usage has since declined to 33 in the 2020s -- if you're weighing a "classic revival" angle, the trend line argues against it.
  • Virginia records the most Garnetts (732 births) -- see the full state breakdown if geography matters to your decision. Virginia names

Figures reflect SSA-reported births only; see the methodology above for the privacy-suppression floor.

Keep exploring Garnett

Nearby Names Like Garnett

Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Garnett

Names with a similar popularity rank to Garnett

Nationwide names with similar peak year or record span

Two nationwide peer axes for Garnett: closest SSA peak year, and closest first→latest record span. Distinct from the spelling and current-rank neighborhoods above.

Peak year is the single SSA year with the most births for that name; record span is first-to-latest year in the national files, not a recommendation or shared origin claim.

Data Sources

Data as of August 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).

According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.

Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 1881–2025 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).

State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).

Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Garnett draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.