Unisex name · since 1998

No

Since 1998, U.S. Social Security records show 12 babies named No, peaking in 2010. See the year-by-year trend, decade totals, and state rankings below, sourced from federal birth data.

12
total births
1998–2010
years on record
2010s
peak decade
58%
born in that decade

No sits outside today's top ranks for girls, with 12 recorded since 1998.

No has 12 recorded births among girls since 1998, per the U.S. Social Security Administration, though it falls outside today's most-used girls names, busiest in the 2010s -- see the year-by-year trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution below, all drawn directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 1998 to 2010.

  • 12 total births
  • 1998–2010 years on record
  • 2010s peak decade
  • 58% born in that decade

Data updated Jul 2026

The verdict

12 girls have been named No since 1998, peaking in the 2010s, last recorded in 2010.

12
total births
1998–2010
years on record
2010s
peak decade
58%
born in that decade
2010s
Peak decade

58% of everyone ever named No was born in this single decade.

2010
Single peak year

7 babies were named No in 2010 - its busiest year on record.

No's usage pattern, beyond the headline number

Divide No's SSA record in two at 2010 and the more recent half accounts for 58% of all births, the earlier half the remaining 42%, a genuinely balanced usage pattern. Its calmest year was 1998, with only 5 births recorded -- set against the 2010 peak of 7, that's the full swing in one name's fortunes.

No at a glance

Last recorded 2010

Total births

12

Since 1998

13 years of records

Peak year

2010

7 births that year

Strongest decade: 2010s

Current rank

Unranked

Outside the modern top-1,000

As of 2010

Active since

1998

Recorded for 13 years

Last year on file: 2010

No popularity over time - girls

Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 1998–2010

Last recorded 2010
Peak year (2010)
7
Annual births at peak, across 13 years of records
4.555.566.577.5 19982010 7

No popularity over time - boys

6 total births recorded since 2010 (No as boys' name)

Unisex variant - 6 births
6 2010 6

No by decade

Total births in each ten-year window, peak vs trough at a glance

2010s was No's strongest decade.

7 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 58% of all-time use.

No births by decade

Total births in each ten-year window

births

What this shows Peak: 2010s at 7 births (58% of all-time use).

Source U.S. Social Security Administration · Baby Names As of July 2026

No by state

Where No concentrates geographically, total births since 1998

Regionally concentrated
Top 2 states by recorded births for the name No
Rank State Visual share Births Share of total
#1 New York
6 50.0%
#2 Arizona
5 41.7%
New York share of No's total US births 50.0%
Even split

6 of 12 births nationwide. Compared to a flat distribution across 2 reporting states.

Frequently Asked Questions

How popular is the name No?
No has been given to 12 babies in the U.S. since 1998, according to SSA data. Its last appearance in the data was 2010. 7 babies were born in 2010, its single highest year.
When was No most popular?
No was most popular in the 2010s decade with 7 total births. The single peak year was 2010.
Where is No most popular?
The top states for the name No are New York (6 births), Arizona (5 births).
Is No a unisex name?
Yes, No is used for both boys and girls. As a girl's name it has 12 births, and as a boy's name it has 6 births.
How long has the name No been used?
Records for No go back to 1998, giving 13 years of history through 2010.
What names are similar to No?
Names with a similar sound or spelling include Norma, Nora, Nova, Noelle, and 4 more. These share a common prefix and are also used for girls.

What to do with No's data

  • New York records the most Nos (6 births) -- see the full state breakdown if geography matters to your decision. New York names
  • Weighing it against an alternative? Put two names side by side. Compare names

Figures reflect SSA-reported births only; see the methodology above for the privacy-suppression floor.

Data Sources

Data as of July 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).

According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.

Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 1998–2010 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).

State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).

Cite this page

NameAlmanac Editorial. "No: Baby Name Since 1998 - 12 Births, Peak 2010." NameAlmanac. Accessed via https://namealmanac.com/name/no. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.

Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for No draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.