Unisex name · since 1998

No

Since 1998, U.S. Social Security records show 12 babies named No, peaking in 2010. See the year-by-year trend, decade totals, and state rankings below, sourced from federal birth data.

#52,166 of 72,339
all-time among girls
12
born since 1998
2010s
peak decade

No sits outside today's top ranks for girls, with 12 recorded since 1998.

No has 12 recorded births among girls since 1998, per the U.S. Social Security Administration, though it falls outside today's most-used girls names, busiest in the 2010s -- see the year-by-year trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution below, all drawn directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 1998 to 2010.

  • #52,166 of 72,339 all-time among girls
  • 12 born since 1998
  • 2010s peak decade

Data updated Aug 2026

The verdict

According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, No ranks #52,166 of 72,339 girls' names by all-time recorded births (highest first). 12 born since 1998, peaking in the 2010s.

#52,166 of 72,339
all-time among girls
12
born since 1998
2010s
peak decade
Below the archive median
All-time archive position

No's 12 recorded births place it above 27.4% of the 72,339 girls names in the full SSA archive.

2 jurisdictions
State-record footprint

The state file records this name in 2 jurisdictions, led by New York.

No's usage pattern, beyond the headline number

Divide No's SSA record in two at 2010 and the more recent half accounts for 58% of all births, the earlier half the remaining 42%, a genuinely balanced usage pattern. Its calmest year was 1998, with only 5 births recorded -- set against the 2010 peak of 7, that's the full swing in one name's fortunes.

No popularity over time - girls

Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 1998–2010

Last recorded 2010
Peak year (2010)
7
Annual births at peak, across 13 years of records
4.555.566.577.5 19982010 7

No popularity over time - boys

6 total births recorded since 2010 (No as boys' name)

Unisex variant - 6 births
6 2010 6

No by decade

2010s is the heaviest window (7 births, 58% of the file).

2010s was No's strongest decade.

7 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 58% of all-time use.

No births by decade

Total births in each ten-year window

births

What this shows Peak: 2010s at 7 births (58% of all-time use).

Source U.S. Social Security Administration · Baby Names As of August 2026

No by state

Where No concentrates geographically, total births since 1998

Regionally concentrated
Top 2 states by recorded births for the name No
Rank State Visual share Births Share of total
#1 New York
6 50.0%
#2 Arizona
5 41.7%
New York share of No's total US births 50.0%
Even split

6 of 12 births nationwide. Compared to a flat distribution across 2 reporting states.

Frequently Asked Questions

How popular is the name No?
No has been given to 12 babies in the U.S. since 1998, according to SSA data. Its archive ordinal is #52,166 of 72,339 among girls' names (total births, highest first). Its last appearance in the data was 2010. 7 babies were born in 2010, its single highest year.
Where does No sit in the SSA name archive?
According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, No ranks #52,166 of 72,339 girls' names by all-time recorded births (highest first). All-time ordinal matches browse popularity (total births DESC); the current ordinal uses the null SSA file. See /methodology#corpus-placement.
When was No most popular?
No was most popular in the 2010s decade with 7 total births. The single peak year was 2010.
Where is No most popular?
The top states for the name No are New York (6 births), Arizona (5 births).
Is No a unisex name?
Yes, No is used for both boys and girls. As a girl's name it has 12 births, and as a boy's name it has 6 births.
How long has the name No been used?
Records for No go back to 1998, giving 13 years of history through 2010.
What names are similar to No?
Names with a similar sound or spelling include Norma, Nora, Nova, Noelle, and 4 more. These share a common prefix and are also used for girls.

What to do with No's data

  • New York records the most Nos (6 births) -- see the full state breakdown if geography matters to your decision. New York names

Figures reflect SSA-reported births only; see the methodology above for the privacy-suppression floor.

Keep exploring No

Nearby Names Like No

Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to No

Names with a similar number of total births

Nationwide names with similar peak year or record span

Two nationwide peer axes for No: closest SSA peak year, and closest first→latest record span. Distinct from the spelling and current-rank neighborhoods above.

Peak year is the single SSA year with the most births for that name; record span is first-to-latest year in the national files, not a recommendation or shared origin claim.

Data Sources

Data as of August 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).

According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.

Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 1998–2010 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).

State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).

Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for No draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.