Unisex name · since 2001
Favour
470 babies named Favour in U.S. Social Security records since 2001, with the highest year being 2016. Year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state-level rankings drawn from federal birth data.
- #10747
- among girls today
- 470
- born since 2001
- 2010s
- peak decade
- 39%
- more common than other girls
470 babies have been named Favour since 2001, making it today's #10747 unisex name.
Social Security Administration records show Favour recorded 470 times among girls since 2001, holding rank #10747 nationally today, ahead of 39% of girls, peaking in the 2010s. This profile derives year-by-year birth trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 2001 to 2025.
- #10747 among girls today
- 470 born since 2001
- 2010s peak decade
- 39% more common than other girls
Data updated Jun 2026
The verdict
Favour is currently the #10747 unisex name in America, more common than 39% of girls - 470 born since 2001, peaking in the 2010s.
- #10747
- among girls today
- 470
- born since 2001
- 2010s
- peak decade
- 39%
- more common than other girls
Favour vs. every other girls name in current SSA rankings
More common than 39% of names given to girls today.
51% of everyone ever named Favour was born in this single decade.
36 babies were named Favour in 2016 - its busiest year on record.
How Favour compares
470 Top 46% higher than 54% of 17,726 names currently given to girls
Based on all-time total births among currently-ranked girls names. Names with fewer occurrences are grouped into wider buckets on the right.
Source U.S. Social Security Administration, national baby name data
How the numbers stack up
Favour's all-time total is 23% above the median girls name, and Olivia still leads by a wide margin.
| Metric | Favour | Median girls name (Emerly) | #1 girls name (Olivia) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All-time total births | 470 | 382 | 567,345 |
| Peak-year births | 36 | 48 | 19,840 |
Favour's usage pattern, beyond the headline number
Splitting Favour's full recorded timeline at 2013, 54% of its total births fall in the more recent half of the record versus 46% in the earlier half -- a fairly even split across the full record. Its quietest year on record was 2001, with just 6 recorded births -- worth weighing against the 2016 peak of 36 to see the full range of the name's swing in popularity.
Favour at a glance
Outside the top 1,000Peak year
Current rank
Active since
Favour popularity over time - girls
Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 2001–2025
- Peak year (2016)
- 36
- Annual births at peak, across 25 years of records
Currently ranks #10747 among girls.
470 total births across 25 years of SSA records. Peaked in 2016 with 36 births in a single year.
Favour popularity over time - boys
37 total births recorded since 2003 (Favour as boys' name)
Unisex use remains the minority pattern
The boys' variant of Favour accounts for 7% of total recorded use across both genders.
Favour by decade
Total births in each ten-year window, peak vs trough at a glance
2010s was Favour's strongest decade.
240 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 51% of all-time use.
Favour births by decade
Total births in each ten-year window
- 2000s
2000s
145 births
- 2010s
2010s
240 births
- 2020s 85
2020s
85 births
What this shows Peak: 2010s at 240 births (51% of all-time use).
Favour decade highlights
- Peak decade 240 births
- Runner-up 145 births
- Modern era share 2010s + 2020s
- Decades tracked with recorded births
Favour by state
Where Favour concentrates geographically, total births since 2001
Top 5 states
- Texas 14.0% of nationwide
- Maryland 2.3% of nationwide
Recorded in 2 of 51 SSA jurisdictions
Texas accounts for 14.0% of all recorded births nationwide - a relatively diffuse profile for this name.
Frequently Asked Questions
How popular is the name Favour? ▼
When was Favour most popular? ▼
Where is Favour most popular? ▼
Is Favour a unisex name? ▼
How long has the name Favour been used? ▼
What names are similar to Favour? ▼
What to do with Favour's data
- Favour's usage has stayed within range of its 2010s decade-level peak (240 total births) through the 2020s (85) -- a comparatively stable name, not a fading trend.
- Texas records the most Favours (66 births) -- see the full state breakdown if geography matters to your decision. Texas names
- Weighing it against an alternative? Put two names side by side. Compare names
Figures reflect SSA-reported births only; see the methodology above for the privacy-suppression floor.
Keep exploring Favour
Nearby Names Like Favour
Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Favour
Compare Favour side by side: Favour vs Faviola Favour vs Favor Favour vs Faven
Related Names
Names with a similar popularity rank to Favour
Data Sources
Data as of June 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).
According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.
Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 2001–2025 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).
State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).
Cite this page
NameAlmanac Editorial. "Favour: #10747 Unisex Name - 470 Births, Peak 2016." NameAlmanac. Accessed via https://namealmanac.com/name/favour. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.
Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Favour draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.
Published by
NameAlmanac Editorial
Independent public-data reference that compiles, verifies, and contextualizes official datasets. We do not accept compensation from entities we cover, and every dataset cites its originating public source.