Boys' name · since 1913

Forbes

Since 1913, U.S. Social Security records show 242 babies named Forbes, peaking in 1918. See the year-by-year trend, decade totals, and state rankings below, sourced from federal birth data.

#12453
among boys today
242
born since 1913
1910s
peak decade
13%
more common than other boys

242 babies have been named Forbes since 1913, making it today's #12453 boys' name.

Forbes has 242 recorded births among boys since 1913, per the U.S. Social Security Administration, ranked #12453 as of the latest data, more common than 13% of boys, busiest in the 1910s -- see the year-by-year trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution below, all drawn directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 1913 to 2025.

  • #12453 among boys today
  • 242 born since 1913
  • 1910s peak decade
  • 13% more common than other boys

Data updated Jun 2026

The verdict

Forbes is currently the #12453 boys' name in America, more common than 13% of boys - 242 born since 1913, peaking in the 1910s.

#12453
among boys today
242
born since 1913
1910s
peak decade
13%
more common than other boys

Forbes vs. every other boys name in current SSA rankings

0%100%Median name50%12.8%
Forbes vs. every other boys name in current SSA rankings
#12453
of 14,294 boys in use

More common than 13% of names given to boys today.

1910s
Peak decade

23% of everyone ever named Forbes was born in this single decade.

1918
Single peak year

12 babies were named Forbes in 1918 - its busiest year on record.

How Forbes compares

242 41th percentile among 14,294 names currently given to boys

Based on all-time total births among currently-ranked boys names. Names with fewer occurrences are grouped into wider buckets on the right.

Source U.S. Social Security Administration, national baby name data

How the numbers stack up

Forbes's all-time total is 34% below the median boys name, and Liam still leads by a wide margin.

Metric Forbes Median boys name (Elchonon) #1 boys name (Liam)
All-time total births 242 367 358,536
Peak-year births 12 23 22,252

Forbes's usage pattern, beyond the headline number

Splitting Forbes's full recorded timeline at 1944, 47% of its total births fall in the more recent half of the record versus 53% in the earlier half -- a fairly even split across the full record. Its quietest year on record was 1913, with just 5 recorded births -- worth weighing against the 1918 peak of 12 to see the full range of the name's swing in popularity.

Forbes at a glance

Outside the top 1,000

Total births

242

Since 1913

113 years of records

Peak year

1918

12 births that year

Strongest decade: 1910s

Current rank

#12,453

Among boys

As of 2025

Active since

1913

Recorded for 113 years

Last year on file: 2025

Forbes popularity over time

Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 1913–2025

Outside the top 1,000
Peak year (1918)
12
Annual births at peak, across 113 years of records
468101214 19131918192519351950199020192025 8

Forbes by decade

Total births in each ten-year window, peak vs trough at a glance

1910s was Forbes's strongest decade.

56 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 23% of all-time use.

Forbes births by decade

Total births in each ten-year window

births

What this shows Peak: 1910s at 56 births (23% of all-time use).

Source U.S. Social Security Administration · Baby Names As of June 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

How popular is the name Forbes?
242 babies have been named Forbes since 1913. It currently ranks #12453 among boys. The peak year was 1918 with 12 births.
When was Forbes most popular?
Forbes was most popular in the 1910s decade with 56 total births. The single peak year was 1918.
How long has the name Forbes been used?
Forbes has been recorded in Social Security data since 1913, spanning 113 years of data through 2025.
What names are similar to Forbes?
Names with a similar sound or spelling include Forrest, Forest, Ford, Fortunato, and 4 more. These share a common prefix and are also used for boys.

What to do with Forbes's data

  • Forbes's usage has stayed within range of its 1910s decade-level peak (56 total births) through the 2020s (32) -- a comparatively stable name, not a fading trend.
  • Weighing it against an alternative? Put two names side by side. Compare names

Figures reflect SSA-reported births only; see the methodology above for the privacy-suppression floor.

Data Sources

Data as of June 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).

According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.

Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 1913–2025 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).

State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).

Cite this page

NameAlmanac Editorial. "Forbes: #12453 Boys' Name - 242 Births, Peak 1918." NameAlmanac. Accessed via https://namealmanac.com/name/forbes. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.

Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Forbes draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.