Boys' name · since 1880

Forest

Forest has 17,784 recorded births since 1880 in federal Social Security data, most heavily in 2022 -- full year-by-year trend, decade aggregates, and state rankings follow.

#883 of 45,481
all-time among boys
#750 of 13,930
2025 SSA year
17,784
born since 1880
1920s
peak decade

17,784 babies have been named Forest since 1880, making it today's #750 boys' name.

Forest has 17,784 recorded births among boys since 1880, per the U.S. Social Security Administration, ranked #750 as of the latest data, more common than 95% of boys, busiest in the 1920s -- see the year-by-year trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution below, all drawn directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 1880 to 2025.

  • #883 of 45,481 all-time among boys
  • #750 of 13,930 2025 SSA year
  • 17,784 born since 1880
  • 1920s peak decade

Data updated Aug 2026

The verdict

According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Forest ranks #883 of 45,481 boys' names by all-time recorded births (highest first) and #750 of 13,930 among boys' names in 2025. 17,784 born since 1880, peaking in the 1920s.

#883 of 45,481
all-time among boys
#750 of 13,930
2025 SSA year
17,784
born since 1880
1920s
peak decade
0%100%Median name50%94.6%
Forest vs. every other boys name in current SSA rankings
Upper archive tier
All-time archive position

Forest's 17,784 recorded births place it above 98.05% of the 45,481 boys names in the full SSA archive.

38 jurisdictions
State-record footprint

38 jurisdictions carry state-level records, led by California.

How Forest compares

17,784 Top 7% higher than 93% of 13,930 names currently given to boys

Based on all-time total births among currently-ranked boys names. Names with fewer occurrences are grouped into wider buckets on the right.

Source U.S. Social Security Administration, national baby name data

How the numbers stack up

Forest's all-time total is 48x the median boys name, and Liam still leads by a wide margin.

Metric Forest Median boys name (Takari) #1 boys name (Liam)
All-time total births 17,784 369 358,536
Peak-year births 375 34 22,252

Forest's usage pattern, beyond the headline number

Splitting Forest's full recorded timeline at 1953, 49% of its total births fall in the more recent half of the record versus 51% in the earlier half -- a fairly even split across the full record. Its quietest year on record was 1881, with just 18 recorded births -- worth weighing against the 2022 peak of 375 to see the full range of the name's swing in popularity.

Forest popularity over time - boys

Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 1880–2025

Top 1,000 boys' name
Peak year (2022)
375
Annual births at peak, across 146 years of records
0100200300400 188018991918193719561975199420132025 344

Forest popularity over time - girls

593 total births recorded since 1890 (Forest as girls' name)

Unisex variant - 593 births
051015202530 189018991914192219351975199220182025 12

Forest by decade

1920s is the heaviest window (2,562 births, 14% of the file).

1920s was Forest's strongest decade.

2,562 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 14% of all-time use.

Forest births by decade

Total births in each ten-year window

births

What this shows Peak: 1920s at 2,562 births (14% of all-time use).

Source U.S. Social Security Administration · Baby Names As of August 2026

How Forest compares to similarly-sized names

Years in SSA records vs. share of all-time use concentrated in the single peak year, among 15 boys names closest to Forest's total volume

Forest vs 15 similarly-sized boys names Scatter plot of 16 data points. 0%2%4%6%8%10% 050100150200 New & already peakedOld name, single-era peakNew & still diversifyingLong history, steady all along Years in SSA records % of total births in the single peak year -99, 3.2%-78, 4.9%-38, 9.3%-120, 3.8%-144, 3.6%-112, 7.2%-72, 5.2%-53, 5.2%-66, 4.2%-134, 6.3%-146, 2.1%-108, 4.6%-146, 2.4%-145, 3.4%-84, 4%Forest-146, 2.1%Forest
Forest vs 15 similarly-sized boys names

Forest by state

Where Forest concentrates geographically, total births since 1880

Geographically diffuse
Top 8 states by recorded births for the name Forest
Rank State Visual share Births Share of total
#1 California
1,314 7.4%
#2 Ohio
1,180 6.6%
#3 Texas
848 4.8%
#4 Kentucky
649 3.6%
#5 North Carolina
583 3.3%
#6 Indiana
543 3.1%
#7 Missouri
479 2.7%
#8 Michigan
477 2.7%
California share of Forest's total US births 7.4%
Even split

1,314 of 17,784 births nationwide. Compared to a flat distribution across 38 reporting states.

Forest appears in 38 states. Explore state details →

Frequently Asked Questions

How popular is the name Forest?
Since 1880, Social Security records show 17,784 babies named Forest. Across the full SSA archive it ranks #883 of 45,481 boys' names by total births. In 2025, it holds #750 of 13,930 among boys. Its busiest year on record was 2022, with 375 births.
Where does Forest sit in the SSA name archive?
According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Forest ranks #883 of 45,481 boys' names by all-time recorded births (highest first) and #750 of 13,930 among boys' names in 2025. All-time ordinal matches browse popularity (total births DESC); the current ordinal uses the 2025 SSA file. See /methodology#corpus-placement.
When was Forest most popular?
Forest was most popular in the 1920s decade with 2,562 total births. The single peak year was 2022.
Where is Forest most popular?
The top states for the name Forest are California (1,314 births), Ohio (1,180 births), Texas (848 births).
How long has the name Forest been used?
Forest has been recorded in Social Security data since 1880, spanning 146 years of data through 2025.
What names are similar to Forest?
Names with a similar sound or spelling include Forrest, Ford, Fortunato, Fortino, and 4 more. These share a common prefix and are also used for boys.

What to do with Forest's data

  • Forest's usage has stayed within range of its 1920s decade-level peak (2,562 total births) through the 2020s (2,086) -- a comparatively stable name, not a fading trend.
  • California records the most Forests (1,314 births) -- see the full state breakdown if geography matters to your decision. California names

Figures reflect SSA-reported births only; see the methodology above for the privacy-suppression floor.

Keep exploring Forest

Nearby Names Like Forest

Names with a similar sound, spelling, or feel to Forest

Names with a similar popularity rank to Forest

Nationwide names with similar peak year or record span

Two nationwide peer axes for Forest: closest SSA peak year, and closest first→latest record span. Distinct from the spelling and current-rank neighborhoods above.

Peak year is the single SSA year with the most births for that name; record span is first-to-latest year in the national files, not a recommendation or shared origin claim.

Data Sources

Data as of August 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).

According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.

Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 1880–2025 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).

State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).

Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Forest draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.