Unisex name · since 1914

Kim

Since 1914, U.S. Social Security records show 179,817 babies named Kim, peaking in 1960. See the year-by-year trend, decade totals, and state rankings below, sourced from federal birth data.

#4788
among girls today
179,817
born since 1914
1960s
peak decade
73%
more common than other girls

Yes -- Kim is the #4788 most popular unisex name in the U.S. today, with 179,817 recorded since 1914.

Kim has 179,817 recorded births among girls since 1914, per the U.S. Social Security Administration, ranked #4788 as of the latest data, more common than 73% of girls, busiest in the 1960s -- see the year-by-year trends, decade totals, and state-level distribution below, all drawn directly from SSA birth-registration files spanning 1914 to 2025.

  • #4788 among girls today
  • 179,817 born since 1914
  • 1960s peak decade
  • 73% more common than other girls

Data updated Jun 2026

The verdict

Kim is currently the #4788 unisex name in America, more common than 73% of girls - 179,817 born since 1914, peaking in the 1960s.

#4788
among girls today
179,817
born since 1914
1960s
peak decade
73%
more common than other girls

Kim vs. every other girls name in current SSA rankings

0%100%Median name50%72.9%
Kim vs. every other girls name in current SSA rankings
#4788
of 17,726 girls in use

More common than 73% of names given to girls today.

1960s
Peak decade

52% of everyone ever named Kim was born in this single decade.

1960
Single peak year

12,477 babies were named Kim in 1960 - its busiest year on record.

How Kim compares

179,817 Top 1% higher than 99% of 17,726 names currently given to girls

Based on all-time total births among currently-ranked girls names. Names with fewer occurrences are grouped into wider buckets on the right.

Source U.S. Social Security Administration, national baby name data

How the numbers stack up

Kim's all-time total is 471x the median girls name, and Olivia still leads by a wide margin.

Metric Kim Median girls name (Emerly) #1 girls name (Olivia)
All-time total births 179,817 382 567,345
Peak-year births 12,477 48 19,840

Kim's usage pattern, beyond the headline number

Splitting Kim's full recorded timeline at 1974, 8% of its total births fall in the more recent half of the record versus 92% in the earlier half -- the name was more prevalent in its earlier era than it is today. Its quietest year on record was 1914, with just 5 recorded births -- worth weighing against the 1960 peak of 12,477 to see the full range of the name's swing in popularity.

Kim at a glance

Outside the top 1,000

Total births

179,817

Since 1914

112 years of records

Peak year

1960

12,477 births that year

Strongest decade: 1960s

Current rank

#4,788

Among girls

As of 2025

Active since

1914

Recorded for 112 years

Last year on file: 2025

Kim popularity over time - girls

Annual U.S. births registered with the Social Security Administration · 1914–2025

Outside the top 1,000
Peak year (1960)
12,477
Annual births at peak, across 112 years of records
-5,00005,00010,00015,000 191419351948196119741987200020132025 34

Kim popularity over time - boys

34,951 total births recorded since 1912 (Kim as boys' name)

Unisex variant - 34,951 births
-1,00001,0002,0003,0004,000 191219321946196019741988200220162025 6

Kim by decade

Total births in each ten-year window, peak vs trough at a glance

1960s was Kim's strongest decade.

94,388 babies received the name during that ten-year window, about 52% of all-time use.

Kim births by decade

Total births in each ten-year window

births

What this shows Peak: 1960s at 94,388 births (52% of all-time use).

Source U.S. Social Security Administration · Baby Names As of June 2026

How Kim compares to similarly-sized names

Years in SSA records vs. share of all-time use concentrated in the single peak year, among 15 girls names closest to Kim's total volume

Kim vs 15 similarly-sized girls names

Kim vs 15 similarly-sized girls names Scatter plot of 16 data points. 0%2%4%6%8% 406080100120140160 New & already peakedOld name, single-era peakNew & still diversifyingLong history, steady all along Years in SSA records % of total births in the single peak year Kim
Kim vs 15 similarly-sized girls names

Kim by state

Where Kim concentrates geographically, total births since 1914

Geographically diffuse
Top 8 states by recorded births for the name Kim
Rank State Visual share Births Share of total
#1 New York
20,639 11.5%
#2 California
17,051 9.5%
#3 Pennsylvania
10,228 5.7%
#4 Michigan
8,945 5.0%
#5 Ohio
8,869 4.9%
#6 Illinois
8,777 4.9%
#7 Wisconsin
7,865 4.4%
#8 Texas
7,178 4.0%
New York share of Kim's total US births 11.5%
Even split

20,639 of 179,817 births nationwide. Compared to a flat distribution across 51 reporting states.

Kim appears in 51 states. Explore state details →

Frequently Asked Questions

How popular is the name Kim?
Kim has been given to 179,817 babies in the U.S. since 1914, according to SSA data. Among girls, it ranks #4788 as of the latest data. 12,477 babies were born in 1960, its single highest year.
When was Kim most popular?
Kim was most popular in the 1960s decade with 94,388 total births. The single peak year was 1960.
Where is Kim most popular?
The top states for the name Kim are New York (20,639 births), California (17,051 births), Pennsylvania (10,228 births).
Is Kim a unisex name?
Yes, Kim is used for both boys and girls. As a girl's name it has 179,817 births, and as a boy's name it has 34,951 births.
How long has the name Kim been used?
The SSA has tracked Kim since 1914 -- 112 years through the most recent 2025 data.
What names are similar to Kim?
Names with a similar sound or spelling include Kimberly, Kimberley, Kimberlee, Kimber, and 4 more. These share a common prefix and are also used for girls.

What to do with Kim's data

  • Kim's decade-level peak was the 1960s (94,388 total births); usage has since declined to 218 in the 2020s -- if you're weighing a "classic revival" angle, the trend line argues against it.
  • New York records the most Kims (20,639 births) -- see the full state breakdown if geography matters to your decision. New York names
  • Weighing it against an alternative? Put two names side by side. Compare names

Figures reflect SSA-reported births only; see the methodology above for the privacy-suppression floor.

Data Sources

Data as of June 2026. Source: U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA).

According to the Social Security Administration, this profile draws directly from the agency's public-use baby-name files (updated June 2026). See our methodology for the full extraction, aggregation, and privacy-suppression rules.

Primary: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications, National Data, 1914–2025 (ssa.gov/oact/babynames).

State-level: Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names, State-Level Files (namesbystate.zip).

Cite this page

NameAlmanac Editorial. "Kim: #4788 Unisex Name - 179,817 Births, Peak 1960." NameAlmanac. Accessed via https://namealmanac.com/name/kim. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.

Name Almanac is rendered directly from the Social Security Administration's public baby-name files, no number is typed in by an editor. This profile for Kim draws directly on SSA national and state-level files, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.